Atty. Darwin Canete's Facebook Got Banned For Telling The Truth; Kian, Not As Innocent As The Media Wants Us To Believe?

In the light of the sensational death of 17 year old Kian delos Santos who is being painted as an innocent victim of police brutality brought about by President Duterte's war on drugs by the mainstream media, there are small voices who are wishing to be heard.

This time the voice proving that Kian delos Santos is not innocent came from Atty. Darwin Canete. Atty. Canete is a known supporter of Duterte on social media. His account is known to be reported by people who disliked him and what he is saying.

His post about the dicrepancies on the report of mainstream media about Kian proved to be his last controversial post before his Facebook account was deactivated. The post were photos from SOCO themselves, and some points that Kian was not innocent at all like what the media want us to believe.

The photo above is from the post. It is from SOCO, it can be seen that Kian has a mark on his waist which proved to be one of the holes in the claim of the mainstream media.

After Canete's Facebook got deactivated, social media blogger Sass Rogando Sasot posted about the fate of Canete's account giving the public an idea why the account was reported and deactivated.

Here is her post: 

This is one of the last posts of Caloocan Asst. City Prosecutor Darwin Cañete whose FB account got deactivated:

1. Kian was in possession of the shabu sachets long before the police got him. This is based on the SOCO pictures of the body (shown by Atty. Cañete) where the sachets clearly left an impression on the side of the body just under the garter of his printed boxers. If the shabu was planted, it will not leave those marks on the skin.

2. Kian was not tortured nor hurt contrary to the claim of a supposed witness. There were no marks of physical abuse on the body as can be seen on the photos, too. The family did not want an autopsy to be performed.

3. The controversial CCTV video which made the case sensational is not fake but it was not Kian on the video because the color of the t-shirt and the lower garments are not the same. The CCTV footage was also recorded an hour before the incident. It is highly probable that it is not connected to Kian's case.

4. They have Kian's phone which contains text messages between Kian, his supplier and their clients. This will be presented if required to those who wish to hold an inquiry.

What can you say about this? Why are they keen on covering up the truth to us?